Package org.bidib.jbidibc.decoder.schema.commontypes

Class ValueCalculationType

  • public class ValueCalculationType
extends Object
    <p>Java class for ValueCalculationType complex type. <p>The following schema fragment specifies the expected content contained within this class. <pre> &lt;complexType name="ValueCalculationType"&gt; &lt;complexContent&gt; &lt;restriction base="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}anyType"&gt; &lt;sequence&gt; &lt;element ref="{http://www.decoderdb.de/schema/commonTypes/1.2}item" maxOccurs="unbounded"/&gt; &lt;element ref="{http://www.decoderdb.de/schema/commonTypes/1.2}specialValue" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"/&gt; &lt;/sequence&gt; &lt;attribute name="unit" type="{http://www.decoderdb.de/schema/commonTypes/1.2}UnitType" /&gt; &lt;attribute name="digits"&gt; &lt;simpleType&gt; &lt;restriction base="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}unsignedByte"&gt; &lt;minInclusive value="1"/&gt; &lt;maxInclusive value="3"/&gt; &lt;/restriction&gt; &lt;/simpleType&gt; &lt;/attribute&gt; &lt;/restriction&gt; &lt;/complexContent&gt; &lt;/complexType&gt; </pre>

    • Constructor Detail

      • ValueCalculationType

        public ValueCalculationType()

    • Method Detail

      • getItem

        public List<ItemType> getItem()
        Gets the value of the item property. <p> This accessor method returns a reference to the live list, not a snapshot. Therefore any modification you make to the returned list will be present inside the JAXB object. This is why there is not a <CODE>set</CODE> method for the item property. <p> For example, to add a new item, do as follows: <pre> getItem().add(newItem); </pre> <p> Objects of the following type(s) are allowed in the list ItemType

      • getSpecialValue

        public List<SpecialValueType> getSpecialValue()
        Gets the value of the specialValue property. <p> This accessor method returns a reference to the live list, not a snapshot. Therefore any modification you make to the returned list will be present inside the JAXB object. This is why there is not a <CODE>set</CODE> method for the specialValue property. <p> For example, to add a new item, do as follows: <pre> getSpecialValue().add(newItem); </pre> <p> Objects of the following type(s) are allowed in the list SpecialValueType

      • getUnit

        public String getUnit()
        Gets the value of the unit property.
        Returns:
        possible object is String

      • setUnit

        public void setUnit​(String value)
        Sets the value of the unit property.
        Parameters:
        value - allowed object is String

      • getDigits

        public Short getDigits()
        Gets the value of the digits property.
        Returns:
        possible object is Short

      • setDigits

        public void setDigits​(Short value)
        Sets the value of the digits property.
        Parameters:
        value - allowed object is Short

      • hashCode

        public int hashCode()
        Overrides:
        hashCode in class Object